From: Bruce Young
Subject: RE: [ALSC-Forum] Consensus
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 23:11:38 -0700
Post a Message
[Date Prev]
[Date Next]
[Thread Prev]
[Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
Other than ALSC members (who obviously have their marching orders from the
board), does anyone have substantive disagreemant with the following five
points Jeff lists below:
1.) That ANY and all Staekholders/Interested Parties are now, and must
be considered At-Large members and can self declare themselves
at any time, as such.
2.) That 9 At-Large directors must be elected by the At-Large membership
or at least 50% of the total number of BoD members seated.
3.) That a method(s) of registering At-Large members is available that does
and must, be secure, insure personal privacy, and is predominantly
funded by ICANN.
4.) That the ICANN BoD and/or staff may determine a membership fee
that is in line with the person(s) that may or are
stakeholders/Interested
Parties or will become so equivalent or in keeping with the average
national income of his resident country or area there of within his
indigenous country.
5.) That any member or user of the internet community is eligible for
At-Large membership without exception.
If not, then I think a concensus can be claimed, at least for this forum.
Bruce Young
Integration Engineer, Client Engineering
Lockheed Martin Global Telecommunications
Phone: 503.466.6571
Fax: 503.466.6775
E-mail: Bruce.Young@nwdc.ibs-lmco.com
[Date Prev]
[Date Next]
[Thread Prev]
[Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]