From: Eric Dierker
Subject: Re: [ALSC-Forum] Concealed
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 08:30:19 -0700
Post a Message
[Date Prev]
[Date Next]
[Thread Prev]
[Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
I wonder if this overwhelming sentiment is not a reflection of some type
of international
code of conduct called "keeping your word is a matter of honor and
right"
It is well worth remembering that the 9 was a direct result of ICANN
wanting the contracts
with DoC and therefor making promises to induce the DoC to choose them.
{i will give you a dime for that apple. thanks for the apple it tastes
great. oh just
kidding about the dime}
Michael Haffely wrote:
> Subject: Re: [ALSC-Forum] Straw Poll
>
> Nine because that was the originally designed in the intent of letting ICANN "go public".
>
> >>> <DannyYounger@cs.com> 10/23/2001 9:33:54 PM >>>
>
> In the final days that remain in this forum, I would like to conduct a simple
> poll of all participants.
>
> Question: How many Directors should the At-Large membership elect?
>
> [ ] Six
> [ ] Nine
> [ ] All
> [ ] Other amount
>
> If you wish, you may cite the reasons for your answer.
>
> **********************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the system manager.
> **********************************************************************
[Date Prev]
[Date Next]
[Thread Prev]
[Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]