Re: [ALSC-Forum] Straw Poll

[Jeff Williams]

Dave and all stakeholders or interested parties,

  No your right there never was a rational for why the ALSC thought
or still thinks that 6 is better than 9.  Most likely there never will be
unless it is provided in the upcoming MdR meeting.  BTW, where
is that Final Report?  It still have not been posted as promised
to this Forum....

DPF wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Oct 2001 22:33:45 EDT, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
>
> >
> >In the final days that remain in this forum, I would like to conduct a simple
> >poll of all participants.
> >
> >Question:  How many Directors should the At-Large membership elect?
> >
> >[     ] Six
> >[X   ] Nine
> >[     ] All
> >[     ] Other amount
>
> I'm still waiting incidentally for a member of the ALSC to provide the
> rationale for how they decided that six seats was better than nine.
> There was not a single of word of rationale for this in the draft
> report.
>
> DPF
> --
> david@farrar.com
> ICQ 29964527

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208