From: hans.klein
Subject: Re: [ALSC-Forum] Inconsistency with ALSC recommendations
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 09:06:49 -0700
Post a Message
[Date Prev]
[Date Next]
[Thread Prev]
[Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
At 06:40 PM 10/24/2001 -0400, Esther Dyson wrote:
>(And yes, our assumption was to stick with the way ICANN does it now,
>unless some more popular approach emerges.)
Sticking with the present ALM arrangement is probably the best solution.
The 6-6-6 proposal is going to be a problem. It changes the terms of
Newco/ICANN privatization agreement of 1998. I recommend that the ALSC
drop this proposal.
As for various definitions of the ALM, every approach will have its
strengths and weaknesses. The present ALM arrangement worked in 4 of 5
regions. That may be as good as any plan gets.
I applaud the ALSC for working to fine-tune the current arrangement. Let's
stick work together to make today's arrangements work even better.
Hans
[Date Prev]
[Date Next]
[Thread Prev]
[Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]