Re: [ALSC-Forum] Consensus

[Jeff Williams]

Danny, Esther and all stakeholders of interested parties,

  I concur with Danny here...

DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

> Esther,
>
> Could you elaborate further on your comment that "I think it's time for the
> ALSC to stop looking for an illusory consensus to present to the board"...
>
> The ALSC was chartered to forge a consensus on the best method for
> representing the world's Internet users as individuals ("At-Large Members")
> within ICANN.  That was your task.  At this late date, are you now claiming
> that the Committee has no consensus to report?
>
> When an issue is under consideration for a lengthy period of time, community
> consensus can usually be determined by a review of the comments tendered on
> the public record.  The public record of comments presented to your Committee
> amply demonstrates that the community expects nothing less than the nine
> At-Large Directors promised.  If you have evidence to the contrary, let me
> humbly request that such be documented...  otherwise, please present to the
> Board this  consensus view of the community (even if it is at odds with the
> recommendation of the Committee).  Anything less would be disingenuous.

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208